Got comments or ideas?
Drop us a line! Your feedback helps us make WOHNO better.
Received an own-use termination (Eigenbedarfskündigung)? This guide walks you through it from the tenant's side: who qualifies as the person with the need (§ 573 BGB), how the staggered periods really calculate (§ 573c BGB), which five formal defects topple a termination, how the hardship objection works (§ 574 BGB) – and what you can claim if the own-use need was only pretended. With an interactive deadline and formal-defect check.
An own-use termination in your letterbox almost always triggers the same two questions: "Do I really have to leave?" and "Do I stand a chance against it?" The good news: own use is the most common but also the most form-strict ground for terminating a residential tenancy. Many terminations fail on exactly that strictness – and even a valid one is not always something you simply have to accept.
This guide is written from the tenant's side. It sorts the rules by what you need first: deadlines, formal defects, objection. If you are in a hurry, check your own case first – it computes your personal deadlines and ticks off the formal points. How it reaches those results, and where its limits are, follows below.
Enter the tenancy start and the delivery date and tick off the formal points. The check computes your personal deadlines (end date, objection deadline) and shows a formal-defect traffic light — no file upload, and anything unclear stays honestly open.
When your tenancy began — it sets the staggered notice period (§ 573c BGB).
The day the termination letter reached you.
Enter the tenancy start and the delivery date to compute your personal deadlines.
Only documented, mandatory formal points. If one is missing, the termination is usually invalid. Whatever you are not sure about: choose “unclear” — the check does not guess.
Written form with the handwritten signature of all landlords
§ 568 (1), § 126 BGB — email, fax or a scanned PDF are not enough; with several landlords all must sign.
Addressed to and received by all tenants named in the contract
With several tenants the termination must go to all of them and reach all of them.
Person with the need named / identifiable
§ 573 (2) no. 2, (3) BGB — an open choice “for one of several people” is not enough.
Justification concrete — need for use plausibly set out
§ 573 (3) BGB — why this particular person needs this particular flat; empty phrases are not enough.
The stated end date matches the calculated period
Compare the date in the letter with the result of the deadline clock above (§ 573c BGB).
No answers yet
Answer the formal points above to get an assessment.
And what if the own-use need was only pretended?
If the person with the need does not move in after you leave, or only briefly, prima facie evidence points to pretended own use — the landlord is then liable for damages (including moving and extra costs; BGH VIII ZR 214/15). Document who actually moves in after you leave. The claim usually becomes time-barred after three years.
Guidance based on your input only: the deadlines are computed under § 573c/§ 574b BGB (the delivery cut-off and working-day/public-holiday questions may differ case by case), and the traffic light only checks the five documented formal points. Not legal advice — before deciding on an objection, consult a tenants' association or a specialist lawyer.
A landlord can only terminate an open-ended residential lease if they have a legitimate interest in ending it (§ 573 (1) BGB). The practically most important case of that interest is own use: the landlord "needs the premises as a dwelling for themselves, their family members or members of their household" (§ 573 (2) no. 2 BGB) Quelle.
Two things follow immediately. First: there is no "termination without a reason" for landlords in residential tenancy law – unlike for you as a tenant, who may give ordinary notice without stating any reason. Second: the own-use need must be genuine. The landlord or a benefiting person must actually intend to use the flat themselves, and that intention must be reasonable and plausible – a mere pretext does not carry the termination.
notice period
3/6/9 months
staggered by tenancy length (§ 573c BGB)
before the end
2 months
objection deadline (§ 574b BGB)
is enough to object
text form
§ 574b (1) BGB – email suffices
The circle of benefiting persons is narrower than many think – but wider than just "spouse and children". The privileged circle, for whom a plausibly explained intention to use is enough, comprises:
The more distant the relationship, the higher the requirements. For more remote persons the courts demand a concrete, established social bond. Cousins are, under the more recent BGH line, no longer automatically part of the privileged circle – here the landlord must set out much more.
This is the most underestimated point. § 573 (3) BGB requires: "The grounds for a legitimate interest of the landlord must be stated in the termination notice" Quelle. The reason must be concrete enough to distinguish it from other possible grounds so you can direct your defence at it.
In practice: the letter must name the person with the need (name, family or household relationship) and set out the concrete intention to use – why that person needs this particular flat. The bare assertion "I need the flat for my daughter" without any comprehensible reason is too thin. And a reason once given cannot later be freely swapped: subsequently added, entirely different grounds usually do not count in a dispute.
That is exactly why it pays to hold the letter word by word against a fixed checklist instead of just reading it once. The formal-defect part of the check above does exactly that.
Even with a legitimate own-use need there are no special periods – the staggered period of § 573c BGB applies. It grows with tenancy length, because a long-established centre of life deserves more lead time to move:
| Tenancy length | Landlord's notice period |
|---|---|
| Up to 5 years | 3 months |
| Over 5 to 8 years | 6 months |
| Over 8 years | 9 months |
This staircase is mandatory in your favour: a contractual shortening to the tenant's disadvantage is void (§ 573c (4) BGB) Quelle. How these staggered periods calculate in general – independently of own use – is covered in the guide on the notice period in a rental contract.
1. Landlord notice period (§ 573c BGB) – grows with tenancy length
2. Objection deadline (§ 574b BGB) – two months BEFORE the end
The notice period is a duration (how long), the objection deadline a cut-off date (by when). They are linked: only the end date fixes when your objection clock runs out.
The error-prone part is not the staircase but the cut-off date. § 573c (1) BGB ties in to delivery: if the termination reaches you by the third working day of a month, that month counts – with the base period the tenancy then ends at the close of the month after next. If it arrives later, the date shifts by a whole month. A single day can therefore decide a whole month's rent.
An example makes this tangible: you have lived in the flat for six years, so the six-month period applies. If the termination reaches you by the third working day of March, the tenancy ends on 31 August – and your objection deadline is two months before that, on 30 June. If the letter only arrives on 5 March, everything shifts by a month: the end moves to 30 September, the objection to 31 July. These two dates – the end of the tenancy and the objection deadline – are exactly what the check above computes from your own delivery date, so you do not have to wrestle with the general "3/6/9 months" rule.
If one of these five points is not met, the termination is as a rule invalid. Each point is backed by a norm or case law – this is the checklist the traffic light in the check also uses:
Even a formally flawless and substantively legitimate own-use termination need not be accepted in every case. § 574 BGB gives you a right to object if the ending would mean a hardship for you, your family or a household member that cannot be justified even weighing the landlord's legitimate interests Quelle. This expressly includes the case where appropriate replacement housing on reasonable terms cannot be obtained (§ 574 (2) BGB).
Two details decide your chances – and both are often overlooked:
Form and deadline. The objection must reach the landlord at the latest two months before the end of the tenancy (§ 574b (2) BGB). But it only needs text form – not the strict written form with a handwritten signature that applies to the landlord's termination. For your objection an email is therefore enough Quelle. This asymmetry – strict form for the termination, mild form for the objection – is tenant-friendly and rarely stated clearly.
The missing notice. If the landlord did not point out the possibility, the form and the deadline of the objection in time, the rigid two-month deadline falls away: you can then still raise the objection at the first hearing of the eviction proceedings (§ 574b (2) sentence 2 BGB). The duty to point this out follows from § 568 (2) BGB Quelle. This is one of the strongest and most underestimated tenant advantages.
If the objection succeeds and you do not reach agreement, the court decides: it can order the continuation of the tenancy – for a fixed term or indefinitely, where appropriate on changed terms (§ 574a BGB).
The objection is not tied to a strict form – text form suffices (§ 574b (1) BGB) – but it should be complete in substance so the court can weigh your situation. Four points have proven useful as a scaffold:
This is a scaffold, not legal advice: with tight deadlines or weighty hardship grounds, have the actual wording read by a tenants' association or a specialist lawyer before you send it.
The strongest lever sometimes only appears after the move-out. If the own use was only pretended, the landlord becomes liable for damages – they must reimburse you, among other things, for moving costs, agent fees and the extra cost of the new flat Quelle.
The burden of proof is decisive: if the alleged person with the need does not move in, or only briefly, prima facie evidence points to pretended own use. The landlord must then plausibly and substantively explain why the need fell away afterwards – if they cannot, they are liable. The claim usually becomes time-barred after three years (§ 195 BGB). The practical advice: document who actually moves into the flat after you leave, and for how long.
An important distinction: an own-use termination is only an abuse of rights if the landlord already foresaw and concealed the need at the conclusion of the contract. There is, by contrast, no general duty to anticipate possible future needs "in advance".
Even once the notice period has expired, nobody turns up the next day with a locksmith. The landlord may not evict you themselves – they must bring an eviction claim before the local court and obtain an eviction judgment. Until a final decision, you stay in the flat; that can take months.
Two safeguards of the Code of Civil Procedure matter here:
Both are narrowly limited exceptions, not a permanent solution – but they show that even after the deadline the move-out is a regulated process with its own safeguards. Doing nothing, however, risks eviction costs and compensation for use. This step, too, belongs in the hands of a tenants' association or a specialist lawyer.
Note when and how the termination arrived (letterbox, hand delivery). The day of delivery sets the end date and the objection deadline – keep the envelope and the letter.
Enter the tenancy start and the delivery date into the check above. You get the earliest possible end of tenancy and – the crucial point under time pressure – the deadline for your objection (two months before the end).
Go through the five formal points: signature, delivery to all tenants, named person with the need, concrete justification, correct period. If one is missing, the termination is usually invalid.
Are there hardship grounds (age plus roots, serious illness, pregnancy, no reasonable replacement housing, children's school-leaving)? Then an objection under § 574 BGB comes into play – in text form, in time.
Before you move out or object, have the case checked by a tenants' association or a specialist tenancy lawyer. Especially with tight deadlines and the missing landlord notice (§ 568 (2) BGB), a lot depends on the individual case.
If the move-out does happen in the end, a careful handover protocol protects you against later disputes and deposit questions. And if you stay in the flat, it is worth looking at your other tenant rights: a possible rent increase you can check with the same approach, and disputes about money can often be settled via the service-charge settlement or a rent reduction for defects.
Even though this guide is written from the tenant's side – the landlord's side is the mirror image of the same rules. Anyone terminating as a landlord can tick off the mandatory points as the mirror image of the formal-defect list:
And the own use must be genuine: if it falls away afterwards, claims for damages loom.
Once it is clear how your deadlines run, the search for the next home begins in parallel – often under time pressure. This is exactly where WOHNO helps: you store your search profile with your budget and your most important routes, and as soon as a matching flat appears you are among the first to know. With an application file set up once, you apply immediately – instead of hunting for documents when the clock is already running.
Ready for the next flat?
With a complete WOHNO profile you apply directly – with your credit check, application file and self-disclosure in one place, the moment your notice period starts.
Editorial note: This article was produced by the WOHNO Editorial team and was last reviewed for the current legal position on 7 August 2026. It reflects the state of German tenancy and civil-procedure law (BGB, ZPO) at that time.
Continue with WOHNO
Mould, a cold heater, construction noise: with a genuine defect you may reduce the rent – by operation of law, no application needed. The catch isn't the percentage, but the risk behind it: whoever cuts too much builds up rent arrears and, in the worst case, risks termination without notice. This article shows the right order (report first, then reduce), calculates from the gross rent, frames the case-law rates as ranges – and explains the safe route: paying under reservation.
Got an increase letter? Check two things separately: the amount (the cap limit and the local comparative rent – the lower value wins) and the form (justification, text form, the double blocking period). Why a formal error voids the whole demand while an excessive amount only voids the excess – plus an interactive checker with a deadline calculator.
A handover protocol is not required by law – but it is your most important piece of evidence. This article shows what really belongs in it at move-in and move-out, who is liable for defects (the burden of proof runs in two stages, not a blanket „the tenant